Before merge
Planned: retain review findings per project.
Connect evidence and quality or security findings to the change under review.
Quality Harness · private Platform direction
Review one result. Build a history across projects.
Quality Harness reviews a particular work result. A separate private Quality Platform is planned for each project’s quality history and oversight across projects.
01
The quality signal missing from faster delivery
A quality leader needs to distinguish two questions: does this particular implementation have adequate evidence, and are repeated changes shifting the quality of each codebase over time? One local review answers only the first. The second requires comparable historical observations within each project.
02
Quality Harness: inspect one work result
The delivered Quality Harness is the fourth role in the BA → Architect → Developer → Quality Harness chain. It opens the relevant package, implementation and evidence; reports findings and its operation-specific verdict; then previews how a result would be applied. Applying that outcome is a separate approved action where the integration is configured. It does not merge the code or establish a live trend dashboard. Read the Quality role guide.
03
Quality Platform: planned project histories
The separate private Quality Platform is planned to retain quality observations for Project A, Project B and other projects, preserving each project’s history and providing a cross-project view. The direction includes baseline and drift tracking. Recurring evaluations and a project dashboard are part of that direction. Talk with us about the access and integrations your team needs.
Planned Quality Platform controls
After merge
Planned: recurring default-branch evaluation.
Keep comparable observations over time so your team can investigate drift across projects.
Baseline signalIllustrative
Illustrative planned view, not live telemetry. Comparable observations help a team investigate changes in quality and security over time.
04
A drift model that guides investigation
- 01
Trend
Compare repeated observations against a chosen default-branch baseline within the same project.
- 02
Threshold
Make a meaningful movement visible against agreed criteria.
- 03
Investigation
Use findings to decide what to inspect next; a score alone does not prove root cause or owner.
Any chart on this page illustrates the intended model, not live telemetry or a deployed production service.
05
Connect quality to the delivery flow
Quality Harness can inspect one Developer result before any approved publication. A future Platform history would add longitudinal context for that project and an overview across projects. Start with the Quality Harness guide for individual reviews, or talk with us about the private Platform.
Request private access
Tell us which projects, baselines and quality questions you need to track. We can discuss the private Platform direction and configured access.